May 2008 Archives by thread
Starting: Wed May 7 03:23:59 EDT 2008
Ending: Wed May 28 11:50:14 EDT 2008
Messages: 152
- [SIPForum-techwg] Important update on SIPconnect 1.1 effort.
Richard Shockey
- [SIPForum-techwg] TEST Please Ignore...
Richard Shockey
- [SIPForum-techwg] The Technical Working Group Chairs are pleased to appoint Spencer Dawkins ..
Richard Shockey
- [SIPForum-techwg] The Technical Working Group Chairs are pleased toappoint Spencer Dawkins ..
Richard Shockey
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposal and additional requirements
Russell Bennett
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposal andadditional requirements
Joanne McMillen
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposal andadditional requirements
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposal andadditional requirements
Joanne McMillen
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposal andadditional requirements
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Zweig, Greg
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Hadriel Kaplan
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Kaushik V Shah
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Richard Shockey
- [SIPForum-techwg] Real Interoperability
Eric Burger
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Kaushik V Shah
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Hadriel Kaplan
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1- Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Joanne McMillen
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1- Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Eric Burger
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Hadriel Kaplan
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Richard Shockey
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Eric Burger
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Janne Magnusson
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Russell Bennett
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Zweig, Greg
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Russell Bennett
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Joanne McMillen
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Richard Shockey
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Dan York
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Uzelac, Adam
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Janne Magnusson
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Joanne McMillen
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Janne Magnusson
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Hiers, David
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Elwell, John
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Joanne McMillen
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Hiers, David
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Dutkiewicz, Marek
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Kaushik V Shah
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Kaushik V Shah
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Dan York
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Elwell, John
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Eric Burger
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (actually, SIPconnect does *not* change SIP)
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Russell Bennett
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Hadriel Kaplan
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect 1.1 -Microsoft proposalandadditional requirements- TCP
Janne Magnusson
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 - Microsoft proposal andadditional requirements
Janne Magnusson
- [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 1.1 timeline - strawman ..
Richard Shockey
- [SIPForum-techwg] Focus on simple PSTN?
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] I meant TCP is STRONGLY RECOMMENED as the default.
Richard Shockey
- [SIPForum-techwg] Trouble Posting
Eric Burger
- [SIPForum-techwg] Focus on simple PSTN?
Francois Audet
- [SIPForum-techwg] Who is the audience for SIPconnect 1.1? Who will be certified? Why are we building it?
Dan York
- [SIPForum-techwg] Getting back to the timeline... Re: SIPconnect 1.1 timeline - strawman ..
Dan York
- [SIPForum-techwg] Real Interoperability
Dan York
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] Siemens proposals concerning SIPconnect 1.1
Elwell, John
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] TCP vs. UDP (SP adoption of TCP?)
Peter Dunkley
- [SIPForum-techwg] Question about annexb=yes or no
mike xu
- [SIPForum-techwg] Broadsoft Contribution to SIPconnect 1.1
Richard Shockey
- [SIPForum-techwg] FW: Input for SIPConnect 1.1
Jamie Palmer
- [SIPForum-techwg] Input for SIPConnect 1.1
Jamie Palmer
- [SIPForum-techwg] New Yahoo Group on Microsoft ResponsePoint & OCS-Office Communications Server
Tom Cross
Last message date:
Wed May 28 11:50:14 EDT 2008
Archived on: Wed May 28 11:49:56 EDT 2008
This archive was generated by
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).