[SIPForum-techwg] Focus on simple PSTN?

[Francois Audet]

That's how I read your comment initially, and I completely agree with it. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry Sinnreich [mailto:hsinnrei at adobe.com] 
> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 21:05
> To: Uzelac, Adam; Audet, Francois (SC100:3055); Elwell, John; 
> Russell Bennett; Janne Magnusson; Hadriel Kaplan; Zweig, 
> Greg; Joanne McMillen; techwg at sipforum.org
> Subject: Re: [SIPForum-techwg] Focus on simple PSTN?
> 
> >Henry challenged that foundational notion
> 
> SIPconnect is clearly useful and the real life requirements 
> are taking shape. My message should rather be understood as a 
> call for a roadmap that includes the rich capabilities of SIP 
> such as presence, IM, video, conferences, etc., and P2P as well.
> 
> Should there be interest in a roadmap, mobile devices must be 
> somewhere up front, at least at the same level of priority as 
> PBX phones.
> 
> So it was a call for a roadmap, rather than a challenge to SIPconnect.
> 
> Thanks, Henry
> 
> 
> On 5/15/08 1:37 PM, "Uzelac, Adam" 
> <Adam.Uzelac at globalcrossing.com> wrote:
> 
> > The abstract of 1.0 states that the goal of the document is 
> to outline 
> > an interface specification that enables direct IP peering between a 
> > SSP and a SIP-enabled Enterprise for PSTN access.  Henry challenged 
> > that foundational notion, and I think it important to gain 
> consensus 
> > that the original goal stands or changes.
> > 
> > Should it be the same, then what are the gaps in the 
> current doc?  I 
> > don't see Russell's input as a proposal for a new document, 
> but rather 
> > fodder for a compare and contrast exercise.
> > 
> > -AU
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org
> >> [mailto:techwg-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Francois Audet
> >> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:12 PM
> >> To: Elwell, John; Russell Bennett; Henry Sinnreich; Janne 
> Magnusson; 
> >> Hadriel Kaplan; Zweig, Greg; Joanne McMillen; techwg at sipforum.org
> >> Subject: Re: [SIPForum-techwg] Focus on simple PSTN?
> >> 
> >> Agreed. I think we should build on top of 1.0.
> >> 
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Elwell, John [mailto:john.elwell at siemens.com]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:59
> >>> To: Russell Bennett; Audet, Francois (SC100:3055); Henry 
> Sinnreich; 
> >>> Janne Magnusson; Hadriel Kaplan; Zweig, Greg; Joanne McMillen; 
> >>> techwg at sipforum.org
> >>> Subject: RE: [SIPForum-techwg] Focus on simple PSTN?
> >>> 
> >>> Russell,
> >>> 
> >>>> Everyone on this list is therefore appropriately motivated
> >>> to get this
> >>>> done - the question under consideration is whether we take an 
> >>>> incremental approach or go for a "big bang"
> >>>> approach.  As much as I wish for the latter, I believe
> >> that service
> >>>> providers and enterprises have too much infrastructure
> >>> investment to
> >>>> contemplate anything other than the former.
> >>> [JRE] But is the Microsoft really an incremental approach?
> >>> Backwards compatibility with 1.0 seems to be lacking somewhat. At 
> >>> first read it looks more like a big bang replacement?
> >>> 
> >>> John
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> techwg mailing list
> >> Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
> >> Unsubscribe or edit options at:
> >> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
> >> 
> 
>