[SIPForum-techwg] Focus on simple PSTN?

[Richard Shockey]

Well remember we don't want to 'overshoot' as well as there are also
significant time to market issues for the various vendors as well. 

 

We need to define a specification that is implementable with a reasonable
amount of time as opposed to pushing too much of the envelope. 

 

We are not trying to 'boil the ocean' here, nor can we fix the well known
problems in the IETF or 3GPP either. 

 

From: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:techwg-bounces at sipforum.org] On
Behalf Of Francois Audet
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:36 PM
To: Henry Sinnreich; Janne Magnusson; Hadriel Kaplan; Zweig, Greg; Joanne
McMillen; Russell Bennett; techwg at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-techwg] Focus on simple PSTN?

 

I agree with Henry.

 

Also, I sense that a lot of people seem to be seeing this as an exercise to
document current practice (with all their limitations), as opposed to best
practices for implementors.

 

I think the days where "basic PSTN equivalency" was the goal are long gone.
I hope we will not "undershoot" and produce as spec that is not ambitious
enough.

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/pipermail/techwg/attachments/20080515/f2ce53f9/attachment.html