[SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 2.0 requirements kick off discussion

[Francois Audet]

Yeah...

It's risky for sure. 

I'm not sure how deep we want to get into this in this document. That's why 
a blanket statement on IP addresses that can be used outside neededing to be public
IP address is what I prefer. 

It's almost like we just need to warn people about the difficulties, as opposed to
write too many rules on this.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dale Worley [mailto:dworley at pingtel.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:19
> To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055)
> Cc: Michael Procter; SIP Forum Tech WG
> Subject: RE: [SIPForum-techwg] SIPconnect 2.0 requirements 
> kick off discussion
> 
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 14:03 -0600, Francois Audet wrote:
> > A Contact header will or will not be used depending on if loose 
> > routing is used, and the topology of the network.
> 
> In various situations, the URI in a Contact header will be 
> used as the request-URI to start a new dialog.  This is done, 
> e.g., in the "call pick-up" operation.
> 
> Dale
> 
> 
>