[SIPForum-techwg] Re: Minutes of the June 12 SIP Phone Task Group Bi-Weekly Meeting (Krishnan, Ravi C.)

[Ravi C. Krishnan]

Hi Larry,

My apologies for not making today's conference call.

Marek's version (improving on Peter's good cut) is very good. A couple of
quick comments:

1. Concur that KPML (RFC-4730) is again about interactions with application
 servers and could be be keptot for now. However, I belive it may be
prudent to keep a temporary place holder until the entire document is
frozen as section perhaps as below:

 
 6.1.4    Other features

           KPML RFC-4730   (Insert in Section 6.4.2.5  OR DELETE)

2.  In section 6.4.2.5, while making reference to a more recent RFC (RFC
4733 versus obsolte RFC 2833), might be good housekeeping move to retain
reference to the obsolte RFC as well (parenthetically) to expeditiously
resolve any differences later. ( Using a trivial example four by four DTMF
matrix has 16 DTMFs in the obsolete RFC versus 15 in the more recent one. 
{There are are also timing considerations for Real Time Text  adequately
addressed in both versions. There will be some repetion in the Media
section which we knew of any way and not necessarily bad}.

Regards.

Ravi

(301)404-7319


On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:00:02 -0400, techwg-request at sipforum.org wrote:
> Send techwg mailing list submissions to
> 	techwg at sipforum.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	techwg-request at sipforum.org
> 
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	techwg-owner at sipforum.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of techwg digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Minutes of the June 12 SIP Phone Task	Group	Bi-Weekly
>       Meeting (Hutton, Andrew)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:54:48 +0100
> From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton at siemens.com>
> Subject: Re: [SIPForum-techwg] Minutes of the June 12 SIP Phone Task
> 	Group	Bi-Weekly Meeting
> To: "'larry schessel'" <lschesse at gmail.com>
> Cc: "'Dutkiewicz, Marek'" <marek.dutkiewicz at polycom.com>,	'SIP Forum
> 	Tech WG' <techwg at sipforum.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<86C65B3BEFC5054395AE1AE297601A4809F3AD58 at ntht203e.siemenscomms.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> Hi Larry,
> 
> Unfortunately I cannot make today's conference call so I send my
apologies
> however I do want to continue to participate.
> 
> I have a few comments on the draft document.
> 
> 1. With regard to DND I think we need to follow/reference the work in the
> BLISS group (See
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elwell-bliss-dnd-00.txt).
> 
> 2. Section 6.4.2.3 (DND) states "If the feature can be activated at both
> the
> server and the device there should be an ability to synchronize the
> functions" - I think that this is a step to far at the moment the
document
> should only cover phone requirements and should not try and specify
> interactions with application servers for control of features.
> 
> 3. KPML (RFC-4730) This is again about interactions with application
> servers
> and I believe should be kept outside the scope this document at this
time.
> 
> 4. Section 6.4.3. Maybe we should combine the "Call Hold" and "Call
> Retrieve" into one "Hold and Retrieve" section.
> 
> 5. Section 6.4.5.2 (3PCC) I also don't know where this should go but do
> feel
> it is core functionality of a SIP UA and should be covered. Maybe 3PCC
> needs
> a section all on its own.
> 
> Regards
> Andy
> 
> 
> Andrew Hutton
> Siemens Enterprise Communications Limited
> 
> Siemens Enterprise Communications Limited. Registered office: Siemens
> House,
> Oldbury, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 8FZ. Registered No: 5903714, England.
> 
> This email contains confidential information and is for the exclusive use
> of
> the addressee. If you are not the addressee then any distribution,
> copying,
> or use of this email is prohibited. If received in error, please advise
> the
> sender and delete immediately. We accept no liability for any loss or
> damage
> suffered by any person arising from use of this email.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: larry schessel [mailto:lschesse at gmail.com]
> Sent: 20 June 2007 16:09
> To: SIP Forum Tech WG; Dutkiewicz, Marek
> Subject: [SIPForum-techwg] Minutes of the June 12 SIP Phone Task Group
> Bi-Weekly Meeting
> 
> All,
> 
> Attached are minutes of the SIP Phone Task Group meeting held June 12,
> 2007. I've also attached the most recent document updated by Marek
> Dutkiewicz based on the June 12 meeting comments. The next meeting
> will be held as follows:
> 
> Date:   Tuesday, June 26, 2007
> Time:   1:00PM EST (NY time)
> Bridge: 218-486-1300, PIN 920441
> 
> Please note, the team is nearly complete defining Telephony
> subsections and content. The next step is applying the same formula to
> other sections such as Presence, IM, and Wireless. It is important
> that people with experience in these non-telephony areas join the call
> and volunteer to update those document sections. We plan to make
> section assignments during the June 26 call so please join the call if
> you can help with non-telephony sections.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Larry Schessel
> SIP Forum Marketing Chairman
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> techwg mailing list
> Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
> Unsubscribe or edit options at: 
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
> 
> Unsubscribe or edit options at:
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
> 
> 
> End of techwg Digest, Vol 20, Issue 11
> **************************************