[SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect - Basic Interop Use Cases Draft

[Peter Musgrave]

Hi Udit, 

 

I agree support for an SDP offer in the 200 OK is not universally
supported and should not be used in basic use cases. I will add a
comment to the document. 

 

(I do find there are times when the delayed offer is a very useful
mechanism - so I encourage implementers to support it!)

 

Thanks,

 

Peter

 

________________________________

From: Udit_Goyal at 3com.com [mailto:Udit_Goyal at 3com.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 12:05 AM
To: Peter Musgrave
Cc: techwg at sipforum.org
Subject: Re: [SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect - Basic Interop Use Cases
Draft

 


Hi Peter, 

For IP-PBX to PSTN calls, will INVITE MUST have SDP. Generally. SIP-PSTN
gateways does not handle INVITE without SDP. 
Basically, what will happen if PBX receives INVITE without SDP to route
call over PSTN, it can happen because of different PBX services
implementation using B2B. 

Regards, 
Udit 




"Peter Musgrave" <PMusgrave at newheights.com> 
Sent by: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org 

06/15/2007 12:29 AM 

To

<techwg at sipforum.org> 

cc

 

Subject

[SIPForum-techwg] SIPConnect - Basic Interop Use Cases Draft

 

 

 



Hi all,



Attached is an initial draft of basic use cases for SIPConnect
enterprise/service provider inter-op.



The genesis of this document was a conversation at the last SIPIT wrt
"what would we test if we had compliant implementations"? This document
is my first stab at trying to get this some of this down on paper.



My goal was to try and steer through some of the various "option 1 vs
option 2" stuff to try and get a useful common denominator.



I'm interested in any and all feedback about the structure, details etc.




Regards,



Peter Musgrave 



Hi all, 

  

Attached is an initial draft of basic use cases for SIPConnect
enterprise/service provider inter-op. 

  

The genesis of this document was a conversation at the last SIPIT wrt
"what would we test if we had compliant implementations"? This document
is my first stab at trying to get this some of this down on paper. 

  

My goal was to try and steer through some of the various "option 1 vs
option 2" stuff to try and get a useful common denominator. 

  

I'm interested in any and all feedback about the structure, details etc.


  

Regards, 

  

Peter Musgrave 
[attachment "sf-draft-IP_PBX_Interop_UseCases_v1.doc" deleted by Udit
Goyal/C/IN/3Com] 
_______________________________________________
techwg mailing list
Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
Unsubscribe or edit options at:
http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments,
is being sent by 3Com for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure and/or distribution by any 
recipient is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete and/or destroy all copies of this message regardless of form and
any included attachments and notify 3Com immediately by contacting the
sender via reply e-mail or forwarding to 3Com at postmaster at 3com.com. 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/pipermail/techwg/attachments/20070615/50880486/attachment-0001.html