[SIPForum-techwg] Question re Application Server

Chris Sibley Chris.Sibley at cbeyond.net
Fri Sep 8 10:44:32 EDT 2006


Team,

Attached is the first pass of my edits for Section 13 to address the
issue that Paul brought up. Please take a look and let me know what you
think. In case you are not aware, I believe we are scheduled to announce
the availability of this recommendation on Tuesday so I would appreciate
your feedback as soon as you can.

Thanks!

--Chris


> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org [mailto:techwg-bounces at sipforum.org]
On
> Behalf Of Chris Sibley
> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 11:21 AM
> To: Paul Kyzivat; SIP Forum Tech WG
> Subject: Re: [SIPForum-techwg] Question re Application Server
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Firstly, my apologies for taking so long to respond. I have been on
> vacation and it's taken a while to dig myself out.
> 
> Secondly, thanks for your very astute comments! You are quite right
> that, given the current wording, calls between Enterprises (handled by
> the SP) would require a B2BUA. When this text was written, we were
> (only) contemplating calls that ORIGINATED from the PSTN and were
> destined to an Enterprise. So, in this scenario, since the headers are
> actually being created for the first time the text would be correct.
> 
> However, as you pointed out, there is certainly significant value in
the
> SP handling calls BETWEEN Enterprises. That said, I think we need to
> clarify Section 13 to define rules for calls that originate from the
> PSTN (current wording) as well as calls that originate from another
> Enterprise (and handled by the SP, of course).
> 
> What do you think? If everyone agrees I can put together something
today
> / tonight and send it out for your review..
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --Chris
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:techwg-bounces at sipforum.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
> > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 1:41 PM
> > To: SIP Forum Tech WG
> > Subject: [SIPForum-techwg] Question re Application Server
> >
> > I am trying to understand the nuances of draft 5, and there is
> something
> > I am unsure of: Is the Application Server required to act as a
B2BUA,
> or
> > is it permitted to act as a proxy? There is no mention of B2BUAs in
> the
> > document, but I think it may be implied.
> >
> > In particular, suppose we have one service provider servicing two
> > enterprises: acme.com and bozo.com.
> >
> > Acme has a phone number +12125551234, and Bozo has +14085556789.
Then
> > Acme calls Bozo. According to the spec, the call from Acme is
> addressed
> > as:
> >
> > 	INVITE sip:+14085556789 at serviceprovider.net;user=phone SIP/2.0
> > 	To: <sip:+14085556789 at serviceprovider.net;user=phone>
> > 	From: <sip:+12125551234 at acme.com;user=phone>
> >
> > But then the instructions for service provider addressing say that
> when
> > this is sent to Bozo that it should be addressed as:
> >
> > 	INVITE sip:+14085556789 at bozo.com;user=phone SIP/2.0
> > 	To: <sip:+14085556789 at bozo.com;user=phone>
> > 	From: <sip:+12125551234 at serviceprovider.net;user=phone>
> >
> > To change the To and From fields in this way requires that the
> > Application Server be a B2BUA. If this is routed using proxy
routing,
> > then the message going to Bozo would perhaps look like:
> >
> > 	INVITE sip:+14085556789 at bozo.com;user=phone SIP/2.0
> > 	To: <sip:+14085556789 at serviceprovider.net;user=phone>
> > 	From: <sip:+12125551234 at acme.com;user=phone>
> >
> > So, is it a requirement to have a B2BUA in the path, or is proxy
> routing
> > ok?
> >
> > 	Thanks,
> > 	Paul
> > _______________________________________________
> > techwg mailing list
> > Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
> > Unsubscribe or edit options at:
> > http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
> 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> This email may contain confidential information. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please advise by return email and delete
> immediately without reading or forwarding to others.
>  -- Cbeyond
> **********************************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> techwg mailing list
> Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
> Unsubscribe or edit options at:
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg


**********************************************************************
This email may contain confidential information. If you are not
the intended recipient, please advise by return email and delete
immediately without reading or forwarding to others.
 -- Cbeyond 
**********************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Section 13.pdf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 27336 bytes
Desc: Section 13.pdf
Url : http://sipforum.org/pipermail/techwg/attachments/20060908/94929cb1/attachment-0002.obj 


More information about the techwg mailing list