[SIPForum-techwg] Question re Application Server

Paul Kyzivat pkyzivat at cisco.com
Thu Sep 7 13:20:21 EDT 2006


Francois,

I don't understand what you have in mind for the use of phone-context in 
this scenario. Can you clarify?

	Thanks,
	Paul

Francois Audet wrote:
> I think it would be worthwile to explain the respective usage of
> phone-context
> and domain when routing.
> 
> In particular, for "incoming calls". 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org 
>> [mailto:techwg-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Chris Sibley
>> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 8:21 AM
>> To: Paul Kyzivat; SIP Forum Tech WG
>> Subject: Re: [SIPForum-techwg] Question re Application Server
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Firstly, my apologies for taking so long to respond. I have 
>> been on vacation and it's taken a while to dig myself out.
>>
>> Secondly, thanks for your very astute comments! You are quite 
>> right that, given the current wording, calls between 
>> Enterprises (handled by the SP) would require a B2BUA. When 
>> this text was written, we were
>> (only) contemplating calls that ORIGINATED from the PSTN and 
>> were destined to an Enterprise. So, in this scenario, since 
>> the headers are actually being created for the first time the 
>> text would be correct.
>>
>> However, as you pointed out, there is certainly significant 
>> value in the SP handling calls BETWEEN Enterprises. That 
>> said, I think we need to clarify Section 13 to define rules 
>> for calls that originate from the PSTN (current wording) as 
>> well as calls that originate from another Enterprise (and 
>> handled by the SP, of course). 
>>
>> What do you think? If everyone agrees I can put together 
>> something today / tonight and send it out for your review..
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Chris
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org 
>> [mailto:techwg-bounces at sipforum.org]
>> On
>>> Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
>>> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 1:41 PM
>>> To: SIP Forum Tech WG
>>> Subject: [SIPForum-techwg] Question re Application Server
>>>
>>> I am trying to understand the nuances of draft 5, and there is
>> something
>>> I am unsure of: Is the Application Server required to act 
>> as a B2BUA,
>> or
>>> is it permitted to act as a proxy? There is no mention of B2BUAs in
>> the
>>> document, but I think it may be implied.
>>>
>>> In particular, suppose we have one service provider servicing two
>>> enterprises: acme.com and bozo.com.
>>>
>>> Acme has a phone number +12125551234, and Bozo has 
>> +14085556789. Then 
>>> Acme calls Bozo. According to the spec, the call from Acme is
>> addressed
>>> as:
>>>
>>> 	INVITE sip:+14085556789 at serviceprovider.net;user=phone SIP/2.0
>>> 	To: <sip:+14085556789 at serviceprovider.net;user=phone>
>>> 	From: <sip:+12125551234 at acme.com;user=phone>
>>>
>>> But then the instructions for service provider addressing say that
>> when
>>> this is sent to Bozo that it should be addressed as:
>>>
>>> 	INVITE sip:+14085556789 at bozo.com;user=phone SIP/2.0
>>> 	To: <sip:+14085556789 at bozo.com;user=phone>
>>> 	From: <sip:+12125551234 at serviceprovider.net;user=phone>
>>>
>>> To change the To and From fields in this way requires that the 
>>> Application Server be a B2BUA. If this is routed using 
>> proxy routing, 
>>> then the message going to Bozo would perhaps look like:
>>>
>>> 	INVITE sip:+14085556789 at bozo.com;user=phone SIP/2.0
>>> 	To: <sip:+14085556789 at serviceprovider.net;user=phone>
>>> 	From: <sip:+12125551234 at acme.com;user=phone>
>>>
>>> So, is it a requirement to have a B2BUA in the path, or is proxy
>> routing
>>> ok?
>>>
>>> 	Thanks,
>>> 	Paul
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> techwg mailing list
>>> Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
>>> Unsubscribe or edit options at:
>>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
>>
>> **********************************************************************
>> This email may contain confidential information. If you are 
>> not the intended recipient, please advise by return email and 
>> delete immediately without reading or forwarding to others.
>>  -- Cbeyond
>> **********************************************************************
>> _______________________________________________
>> techwg mailing list
>> Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
>> Unsubscribe or edit options at:  
>> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
>>
> 


More information about the techwg mailing list