[SIPForum-techwg] Comments from 2/27 - 3/2

[Francois Audet]

Looks good to me.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org 
> [mailto:techwg-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Chris Sibley
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 11:54
> To: Joanne McMillen; techwg at sipforum.org
> Subject: RE: [SIPForum-techwg] Comments from 2/27 - 3/2
> 
> 
> Hi Joanne,
> 
> Actually, on the Firewall and NAT traversal issue I thought 
> that we had already agreed to change the wording so that it 
> would 1) accommodate the use of SIP-aware firewalls, SBCs, 
> etc. and 2) not specifically mandate the exclusion of 
> symmetric NATs and ALGs.
> 
> Here's the latest (draft 5) text as I have it right now. Feel 
> free to suggest any additional changes you think are needed..
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --Chris
> 
> -----------
> 8	Firewall and NAT Traversal
> 
> IP addresses contained within the SIP headers of messages 
> exchanged between the Service Provider and Enterprise 
> networks MUST be publicly routable IP addresses.
> 
> This requirement implies that any "fix up" functions 
> necessary for NAT traversal have already been performed 
> either by the device originating the message (i.e. using 
> STUN/TURN/ICE, static configuration, etc.) or by a network 
> element (i.e. SIP-aware firewall, Session Border Controller,
> etc.)
> before the message is permitted to leave the Service Provider 
> / Enterprise network edge.
> 
> Service Provider and Enterprise network firewalls SHOULD be 
> STUN-friendly (RFC 3489 [18]), meaning that they do not 
> interfere with the proper operation of STUN between inside 
> hosts and a STUN server in the DMZ.
> --------------
> 
> > 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> This email may contain confidential information. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, please advise by return email and 
> delete immediately without reading or forwarding to others.
>  - Cbeyond 
> **************************************************************
> ********-----Original Message-----
> > From: Joanne McMillen [mailto:joanne at avaya.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 10:40 AM
> > To: Chris Sibley; techwg at sipforum.org
> > Subject: Re: [SIPForum-techwg] Comments from 2/27 - 3/2
> > 
> > Thanks Chris - I was getting ready to suggest something 
> similar for a 
> > "discussion/voting" list for what's still outstanding so we could
> all be
> > clear about what those are. It's not clear we have reached 
> consensus 
> > about Firewall and NAT Traversal. Is that one that will be in that
> list?
> > If not, can you circulate that updated text separately so we are all
> on
> > board with the latest text and are sure we all agree? I 
> believe there 
> > were significant changes proposed.
> > 
> > Thanks - Joanne
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chris Sibley" <chris.sibley at cbeyond.net>
> > To: <techwg at sipforum.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 7:19 AM
> > Subject: [SIPForum-techwg] Comments from 2/27 - 3/2
> > 
> > 
> > > Ernst, Hadriel, Paul/Cullen, Rohan, et al.,
> > >
> > > Thanks once again for reviewing and commenting on the 
> latest version
> of
> > > the
> > > draft. In the interest of time, rather than respond to 
> each of your
> > posts
> > > individually I thought that I would take the following approach:
> > >
> > > 1 - Consolidate all requested changes into a "master list".
> > >
> > > 2 - Update the current working draft (draft 5) based on 
> this master
> list
> > > where:
> > >
> > > A - The change is only minor (i.e. a nit)
> > >
> > >       and/or
> > >
> > > B - At least one other person has made the same comment
> > >
> > > (I will of course document these changes in the draft 
> release notes
> so
> > > that
> > > everyone can see what was changed.)
> > >
> > > 3 - For anything "left over", I will put together a consolidated
> email
> > of
> > > those items that still need discussion and send it out to 
> the group.
> > >
> > > Sound good?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > --Chris
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > techwg mailing list
> > > Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
> > > Unsubscribe or edit options at: 
> > > http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
> > >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> techwg mailing list
> Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
> Unsubscribe or edit options at:  
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
> 
>