[SIPForum-techwg] Comments from 2/27 - 3/2

[Joanne McMillen]

Thanks Chris - I was getting ready to suggest something similar for
a "discussion/voting" list for what's still outstanding so we could all be
clear about what those are. It's not clear we have reached consensus
about Firewall and NAT Traversal. Is that one that will be in that list?
If not, can you circulate that updated text separately so we are all on
board with the latest text and are sure we all agree? I believe there
were significant changes proposed.

Thanks - Joanne

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Sibley" <chris.sibley at cbeyond.net>
To: <techwg at sipforum.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 7:19 AM
Subject: [SIPForum-techwg] Comments from 2/27 - 3/2


> Ernst, Hadriel, Paul/Cullen, Rohan, et al.,
>
> Thanks once again for reviewing and commenting on the latest version of 
> the
> draft. In the interest of time, rather than respond to each of your posts
> individually I thought that I would take the following approach:
>
> 1 - Consolidate all requested changes into a "master list".
>
> 2 - Update the current working draft (draft 5) based on this master list
> where:
>
> A - The change is only minor (i.e. a nit)
>
>       and/or
>
> B - At least one other person has made the same comment
>
> (I will of course document these changes in the draft release notes so 
> that
> everyone can see what was changed.)
>
> 3 - For anything "left over", I will put together a consolidated email of
> those items that still need discussion and send it out to the group.
>
> Sound good?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> techwg mailing list
> Send mail to: techwg at sipforum.org
> Unsubscribe or edit options at: 
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/techwg
>