[SIPForum-techwg] STUN usage in PBX SP interface draft

[Francois Audet]

We can't really point to "drafts", especially these ones which changes
drastically every 4 months.
 
We'll have to either use RFC 3489, or if 3489bis becomes an RFC soon,
that 3489bis RFC.
 
Same thing applies to ICE: we can't refer to it until it becomes an RFC.


________________________________

	From: techwg-bounces at sipforum.org
[mailto:techwg-bounces at sipforum.org] On Behalf Of Sharon Laivand
	Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 7:21 AM
	To: techwg at sipforum.org
	Subject: [SIPForum-techwg] STUN usage in PBX SP interface draft
	
	

	Hello all,

	 

	As you all probably know, STUN standardization moves towards
RFC-3489-bis-04. The latest STUN draft is not backwards compatible with
RFC 3489.

	The new STUN draft is fitted to co-operate with ICE
functionality. Therefore we can assume that at that point or another,
the bis-04 drat will replace the 3489 one...

	 

	 

	Why don't we put the RFC-3489-bis-04 as the "MUST" one (or at
least optional) in the PBX-SP interface draft?

	 

	 

	Thanks.

	 

	Sharon Laivand

	RADVISION,  TBU

	www.radvision.com <http://www.radvision.com/> 

	 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://sipforum.org/pipermail/techwg/attachments/20060731/21ee43cb/attachment-0002.html