[SIPForum-discussion] =?GB2312?B?UmU6IFtTSVBGb3J1bS1kaXNjdXNzaW9uXSC72Li0?= =?GB2312?B?o7ogUmU6IFdoaWNoIG9uZSBtYWludGFpbiB0aGU=?= =?GB2312?B?IHJvdXRlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGluIFNJUCwgdA==?= =?GB2312?B?cmFuc2FjdGlvbiBsYXllciBvciBJUCBsYXllcj8=?=

[Peili Xu]

Hi Mark,

Although similar at abstract level, SIP strict route and loose route
are different concepts from IP route. You can find definition of
strict route&loose route in rfc3261.

regards.
Peili

ÔÚ 07-9-3£¬mark lee<gogofly_lee at yahoo.com.cn> дµÀ£º
> Hi,Peili:
> In the IP pocket, strict route or loose route item can be located in the IP
> header for pocket routing, in the SIP,  strict route or loose route is also
> used by SIP signal,but it's used by different layer, I want to know: is the
> strict route/loose route of SIP same as the strict route/loose route of IP
> header? or the strict route/loose route of SIP is a new item which is only
> used by SIP route?
>
> Thanks
> Mark
>
> Peili Xu <xupeili at huawei.com> дµÀ£º
> Hi Mark,
>
> Could you please clarify what do you mean by saying "route information"?
> route-set?
>
> Peili
>
> ÔÚ 07-9-3£¬mark lee дµÀ£º
> > Hello, everyone:
> > As you know, SIP defines strict route and loose route, could you tell me
> > which layer should maintain the route information in couple of cases,
> > transaction layer or IP layer?
> >
> > Thanks a lot
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > ________________________________
> > ÑÅ»¢ÓÊÏ䣬ÒÔ°²È«Öø³Æ£¬ÊÇÖµµÃÐÅÀµµÄÓÊÏäר¼Ò£¡
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> > http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> > Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>  ÑÅ»¢Ãâ·ÑÓÊÏ䣬ȫÇòµÚÒ»ÓÊÏäÆ·ÅÆ£¡
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the SIP Forum discussion mailing list
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE, or edit your delivery options, please visit
> http://sipforum.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
> Post to the list at discussion at sipforum.org
>
>